Jean-François Revel

Review of “Histoire de la philosophie occidentale”

Critique de L’Histoire de la philosophie occidentale, à l’occasion de sa réédition, parue dans le Times Literary Supplement le 13 mai 1994, par Henri Astier.

This one-volume edition of Jean-Francois Revel’s two-part Histoire de la philosophie occidentale (first published in the late 1960s) covers thinkers from the pre-Socratics to Kant. It is a jargon-free narrative intended for general readers, not a treatise for philosophy students — “Histoire” is meant as “story” rather than “history”. But neither is it a bland “Western-civ-for-infants” manual — Revel has a serious point, which he makes with both gusto and erudition: philosophy is dead.

In a nutshell, philosophy arose from men’s desire to make sense of the world around them without resorting to religion. Early Ionian thinkers (notably Thales and Herodotus) had a passion for observing nature and founded philosophy on the rejection of myth. But the search for hidden truths, and the discarding of outward phenomena, made a comeback with Plato. For the next two mellenia, philosophers oscillated between two conceptions of knowledge, one emphasizing concrete observation and the other general theories of a deeper reality.

This, Revel argues, changed with the birth of modern science as a separate branch of inquiry. Philosophers faced a difficult choice: they could either focus on their core metaphysical activities and drift towards brainy triviality (Descartes), or embrace empiricism, which meant winding up the business (Kant). The irrelevance of modern philosophy is not argued with any hostility — the author used to teach the subject. Incidentally, the book marked the end of philosophy for Revel, who focused on politics after the success of Without Marx or Jesus in 1970. His central message, however, remained the same: men achieve knowledge by trying hard to look at reality as it is, not as they would like it to be.

Henri Astier

  1. 29 October 2011 | 10:30

    […] que le stoïcisme ? Jean-François Revel dans sa précieuse Histoire de la philosophie occidentale, dit judicieusement que jusqu'au 18e siècle et en dehors des options religieuses, le seul choix […]

  2. bessy
    30 October 2013 | 1:23

    it s ironical to meet a philosophy teacher who claims in no uncertain terms that what he s been teaching was obsolete and therefore,logically resigned from his job!………I fully agree with this great thinker who never uses obfuscating jargon and who straightforwardly lets you know what he thinks……One thing is for sure ,philosophy ,back in history was the only way to ask questions,observe as there was no science to provide unbiassed account of the world and in those days people relied on myth and gods or goddesses to explain this mysterious world they were a part of…..philosophy reigned supreme and humans made offerings to the divinities to woe them over……..But in the course of time,progress in science and technology enabled mankind to make all sorts of discoveries and the Tools of a nascent science provided more and more answers and relegated philosophy to the realm of metaphysics where,in passing,it was on an equal footing with science for endless ratiocination.Moreover,we unconsciously feel that such questions as …the meaning of life…was the universe born by chance…is there life after death….though essntial are far removed from our conprehension and they could remain beyond if the human machine isn t fitted with adequate hardware(senses) or software(brain)